<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rediscovering Photography &#187; polaroid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjbpix.com/tag/polaroid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjbpix.com</link>
	<description>Info And News On The Latest Small Digital Cameras</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Polaroid&#8217; &#8211; An interesting way of displaying groups of digital photos.</title>
		<link>http://mjbpix.com/a-very-interestion-way-of-displaying-groups-of-digital-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://mjbpix.com/a-very-interestion-way-of-displaying-groups-of-digital-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Using Your Photos To Make A Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web_photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjbpix.com/WordPress/archives/27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Updated: 3/9/08: See this page with a &#8216;cleaner&#8217; display of the photo display options and links for further information.) Here is something I&#8217;ve been looking at the last few days. A &#8216;polaroid viewer&#8217; plugin that you can use with WordPress. I can see how this would be a nice way of displaying a bunch of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Updated: 3/9/08: <a href="http://mjbpix.com/WordPress/photos/">See this page</a> with a &#8216;cleaner&#8217; display of the photo display options and links for further information.)</p>
<p>Here is something I&#8217;ve been looking at the last few days. A &#8216;polaroid viewer&#8217; plugin that you can use with WordPress. </p>
<p>I can see how this would be a nice way of displaying a bunch of &#8216;event&#8217; type photos for someone to browse through. It seems much more interactive and fun than a page of tiny thumbnails staring you in the face.</p>
<p>In the previous post I was testing this and some other variations to display photos. I wanted to find some workable options for a photo-blog site. Even though I&#8217;ve only worked with these systems for a few days, I am quite impressed.</p>
<p>Since time flies on the &#8216;Net, I will probably have this post and the previous one up for a while in their &#8216;test&#8217; state. When I have some final positive results, I&#8217;ll move things to a separate page to keep as a reference guide. It will take at least a number of hours to work through all the options and configuration possibilities on these plugins.</p>
<p>Be warned: It will probably take a few minutes to load the photos below if you are on a fast connection to the Net. And a LOT longer on dial-up. I&#8217;ll be changing this soon, but I want see actual load times. (Patience is a virtue. [grin])</p>
<p>[polaroid=3,520,520]</p>
<p>To use this viewer, click to drag and move the photos. Double-click on a photo to expand or collapse. Drag out the ?-mark in the upper left hand corner for help. In some of the tests below I am using some of my low resolution kitchen photos to test different options.</p>
<p>For the viewer above I am currently using about 30 fairly high resolution photos. I want to see how this works. Most of the photos are sized at 1200 X 800 pixels. That&#8217;s larger than they would need to be (the viewer is sized at 600 x 550 pixels) and the images are 455 x 455 px, but I want to check load times and how responsive it is.</p>
<p>One &#8216;feature&#8217; of the viewer is that it &#8216;writes&#8217; the file name at the bottom of polaroid. In checking, it seems that there is about a 50 character maximum before the name is truncated. Also, the minimum height of the viewer probably needs to be at least 550 pixels. I want to do some more testing at other screen resolutions.</p>
<p>And the actual displayed image is approx 455 x 455 pixels. So I would assume that would be the appropriate size for uploaded photos using this.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a quick test of the viewer sized at 455 x 520 which looks like the minimum size where you can still see the entire photo when one is maximized. (This size does cut off the bottom of the &#8216;polaroid&#8217; and part of the file name would not be visible if it required two lines to display.)</p>
<p>[polaroid=2,455,520]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mjbpix.com/a-very-interestion-way-of-displaying-groups-of-digital-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
